/* Copyright (c) 2006, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
 * All rights reserved.
 * 
 * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
 * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
 * 
 *     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice,
 *       this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
 *     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
 *       notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
 *       documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
 *     * Neither the name of the Sun Microsystems, Inc. nor the names of its
 *       contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
 *       this software without specific prior written permission.
 * 
 * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
 * AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
 * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
 * ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
 * LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
 * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
 * SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
 * INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
 * CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
 * ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF
 * THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
 */

BABYL OPTIONS:
Version: 5
Labels:
Note:   This is the header of an rmail file.
Note:   If you are seeing it in rmail,
Note:    it means the file has no messages in it.

1, filed,,
Summary-line: 11-Jan       sreeni@cs.albany.edu  #A note on using RE's matching the emty string
Return-Path: <sreeni@cs.albany.edu>
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM by schizophrenia.Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id HAA21134; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 07:47:28 -0800
Received: from sunmail1.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id HAA02652; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 07:44:26 -0800
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM by sunmail1.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-4.1)
	id HAA06974; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 07:44:26 -0800
Received: from suntest.Eng.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id HAA02640; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 07:44:24 -0800
Received: from asap.Eng.Sun.COM by suntest.Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id HAA21295; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 07:44:18 -0800
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM by asap.Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id HAA24684; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 07:44:19 -0800
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id HAA02630; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 07:44:17 -0800
Received: from cs.albany.edu (cs.albany.edu [169.226.2.22]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id HAA01828 for <jack-interest@asap.eng.sun.com>; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 07:44:18 -0800
Received: from bhaskara.cs.albany.edu (sreeni@bhaskara.cs.albany.edu [169.226.2.60]) by cs.albany.edu (8.7.4/HUB03) with ESMTP id KAA01464; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 10:44:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from sreeni@localhost) by bhaskara.cs.albany.edu (8.7.4/CLI2) id KAA09608; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 10:43:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Sreenivasa Rao Viswanadha <sreeni@cs.albany.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 10:43:58 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199701111543.KAA09608@bhaskara.cs.albany.edu>
To: jack-interest@asap.Eng.Sun.COM
Subject: A note on using RE's matching the emty string
Cc: sreeni@cs.albany.edu
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1639
X-Lines: 32
Status: RO

*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <sreeni@cs.albany.edu>
From: Sreenivasa Rao Viswanadha <sreeni@cs.albany.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 10:43:58 -0500 (EST)
To: jack-interest@asap.Eng.Sun.COM
Subject: A note on using RE's matching the emty string
Cc: sreeni@cs.albany.edu
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1639
X-Lines: 32


In the last couple of days, we had seen a couple of users facing problems with
regular expressions that match "". There is a minor bug in the way it is 
implemented in 0.6.-9. We will fix it.

But the purpose of this mail is to suggest you should be careful when you use
RE's that match the "" string. Consider the following example of string literals
where two consecutive "" are interpreted as the literal " (equivalent to \" in
Java).

< STRING_LITERAL: ( "\"" (~["\""])* "\"" )* >

This will work in general. But, if this a part of a lot of other lexical rules,
then if there a lexical error, say a char is given that cannot be the first one
of any token, then, the lexer decides to use the empty string "" and match it
as STRING_LITERAL without actually giving the lexical error. And since this is
the empty string, no character will be consumed and you will start getting the
same STRING_LITERAL token (with "" as the image) infinte number of times. In
fact, if this was the only lexical rule, then if you give a input that starts
with any char other than the ", you will get into an infinite loop.

So a better alternative is to use the + operator which will not match the empty
string. As a matter of fact, I don't know any practical grammar where matching
"" is useful.

In version 0.5, the lexer generated implicitly treated it as + (which is not
totally right). But in 0.6.-9, it does it right and so there is a chance that
your grammar that used to work with 0.5 will not work with 0.6.-9. So if you
have any top-level lexical rule with ? or *, please change those rules so that
they don't match the empty string "".

Sreeni.


1,,
Summary-line: 11-Jan         kimbo@highway1.com  #Re: Looking for HTML.jack
Return-Path: <kimbo@highway1.com>
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM by schizophrenia.Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id QAA21339; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 16:41:53 -0800
Received: from sunmail1.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id QAA18458; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 16:38:44 -0800
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM by sunmail1.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-4.1)
	id QAA16642; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 16:38:51 -0800
Received: from suntest.Eng.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id QAA18449; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 16:38:42 -0800
Received: from asap.Eng.Sun.COM by suntest.Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id QAA23127; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 16:38:42 -0800
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM by asap.Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id QAA24956; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 16:38:41 -0800
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id QAA18438; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 16:38:36 -0800
Received: from chmls01.highway1.com (ne.highway1.com [24.128.1.82]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id QAA22125 for <jack-interest@asap.Eng.Sun.COM>; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 16:38:42 -0800
Received: from papa ([24.128.36.164]) by chmls01.highway1.com
          (Netscape Mail Server v2.0) with SMTP id AAA17669;
          Sat, 11 Jan 1997 19:38:31 -0400
Message-ID: <32D83288.5A8@highway1.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 19:38:32 -0500
From: kimbo@highway1.com (Kimbo Mundy)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rupert Nagler <nagler@idi.co.at>
CC: jack-interest@asap.Eng.Sun.COM
Subject: Re: Looking for HTML.jack
References: <1.5.4.32.19970111214054.0069e40c@mail.austria.eu.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Lines: 13
Status: RO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Length: 447

*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kimbo@highway1.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 19:38:32 -0500
From: kimbo@highway1.com (Kimbo Mundy)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rupert Nagler <nagler@idi.co.at>
CC: jack-interest@asap.Eng.Sun.COM
Subject: Re: Looking for HTML.jack
References: <1.5.4.32.19970111214054.0069e40c@mail.austria.eu.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Lines: 13
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Length: 447

Rupert Nagler wrote:
> 
> I am very impressed by the Jack-Concept and I am looking for a "HTML.jack".
> Is there anybody out there who has an example of a Jack-Definition file for
> HTML 3.2?

I previously sent a message entitled "A first cut at an HTML grammar".
Did people not get it?  If not, see:
http://www.tiac.net/users/kimbo/jack/HTML.jack

> Is there a way to construct a *.jack file out of a *.sgml file?

Sorry, I can't help with this.


1,,
Summary-line: 13-Jan         kimbo@highway1.com  #Re: HTML?
Return-Path: <kimbo@highway1.com>
Received: from suntest.Eng.Sun.COM by schizophrenia.Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id XAA21746; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 23:06:34 -0800
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM by suntest.Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id XAA29422; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 23:03:31 -0800
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id XAA07269; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 23:03:30 -0800
Received: from chmls01.highway1.com (ne.highway1.com [24.128.1.82]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id XAA18021 for <sankar@suntest.Eng.Sun.COM>; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 23:03:30 -0800
Received: from papa ([24.128.36.164]) by chmls01.highway1.com
          (Netscape Mail Server v2.0) with SMTP id AAA20062
          for <sankar@suntest.Eng.Sun.COM>; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 02:03:25 -0400
Message-ID: <32D9DE40.3604@highway1.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 02:03:28 -0500
From: kimbo@highway1.com (Kimbo Mundy)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sriram Sankar <sankar@suntest.Eng.Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: HTML?
References: <199612162037.MAA29649@schizophrenia.Eng.Sun.COM>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Lines: 34
Status: RO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Length: 1420

*** EOOH ***
Return-Path: <kimbo@highway1.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 02:03:28 -0500
From: kimbo@highway1.com (Kimbo Mundy)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sriram Sankar <sankar@suntest.Eng.Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: HTML?
References: <199612162037.MAA29649@schizophrenia.Eng.Sun.COM>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Lines: 34
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Length: 1420

Well, I finally got an HTML grammar out there (at
http://www.tiac.net/users/kimbo/jack/HTML.jack).  I hope you saw it, I
got some mailer errors, that seemed like the kind that you could ignore,
but at least one person didn't receive my first posting.

I'd be interested to know if this is the sort of thing people are
looking for, or do they want the full set of tags enumerated in the
grammar as well?  Also, if there you have any desire to bundle this with
Jack (possibly after upgrades and/or integration with other people's
work), please feel free.

I must say Jack is an amazing tool.  It was really easy to learn.  I
love how readable the grammars are, and I love being able to pass info
up and down the productions as the parser runs.  I never want to have to
settle for LALR(1) again!  Thanks for writing it!


